Editorial policy

Applicable principles

Each review shall begin with an orderly record of name, source, text, verification status and history. The editorial team shall distinguish between relatively fixed information, such as the name of the mark, and a fast-changing information, such as offers, payment methods and acceptance by countries. The information shall not be qualified as confirmed without appropriate source, when the text is opposed to the direct source, priority is given to the direct source and the amendment is recorded.

• Potential commission does not affect allowing risk concealment or change of rank.
• Each digital evaluation must be in the review; otherwise it appears unavailable.
• Technical and legal access or availability is not equal.
• Repeat content is removed and the pages representing the same entity are consolidated.
• Changed allegations are reviewed periodically and are dated as a result of the examination.

What that means to readers.

If the information is not available, we will not replace it with an estimate, and if a fact that affects the decision changes, the text, status and history must be updated or the page should be withdrawn from indexing until it is reviewed.

Read the warnings, compare the source and use funds that cannot afford to lose.